United States v. Lowrey
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
The defendant was convicted of transporting a car from Greensburg, Pennsylvania, to Wheeling, West Virginia, knowing the same to have been stolen. He now, appearing pro se, moves for a new trial on a number of grounds which may be briefly stated as follows:
1. The trial judge did on September 9, 1947, “express his opinion; on a petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; Said Writ was granted in favor of the petitioner.”
2. Double jeopardy.
3. Did not have counsel of his own choosing.
4. Counsel did not have time to prepare case.
5. Government witnesses were prejudiced and gave…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Stroud v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Lowrey v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
3Cited by22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- United States v. Dominick Sabella and Charles LacasciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Loren E. Barry v. Maurice Sigler, Warden, Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- State v. ParisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- United States v. Brad K. BenekeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.