Legal Opinion

Lane Bros. v. Sheinwald

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 6, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action of contract based on a written guaranty. The facts are these: The plaintiff refused to sell merchandise on credit to the Foss Shoe Inc. unless the latter gave to it a guaranty of a debt then existing or to be incurred thereafter to a specified amount. The plaintiff gave a stock form of guaranty, suitable for signature by anybody, to the Foss Shoe Inc. whose manager took it to the defendant and made to him a full statement of the facts just narrated. The defendant thereupon signed the guaranty and turned it over to the manager, to be in turn delivered by him to the plaintiff.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lennox v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Stauffer v. KochMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Black, Starr & Frost v. GrabowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  2. Mayo v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Manley Brothers, Inc. v. BushSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  4. Vacuum Oil Co. v. SmooklerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Century Indemnity Co. v. BloomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API