Vacuum Oil Co. v. Smookler
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract to recover a balance due on account of one A. Palder upon an alleged guaranty in writing signed by the defendant. The case was tried in the Superior Court before a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $1,484.98. The guaranty is as follows: “September 17, 1927. I hereby guarantee payment of the account of A. Palder, covering purchases of oil made from the Vacuum Oil Company up to and not exceeding $1500.00. Capital Tire & Rubber Co. Hyman Smookler. Terms on carload purchase 60-90-120-150 days from Oct. 1st, 1927.” There was evidence that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stauffer v. KochMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Black, Starr & Frost v. GrabowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Lane Bros. v. SheinwaldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Izumi v. Kwan Doo ParkHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- Mayo v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Carzis v. HasseyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
- Synthetic Materials Corp. v. MacielMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979