Legal Opinion
In Re Peterson
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota
Decided October 2, 1992No. 19-40001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASE SUMMARY
PEDER K. ECKER, Bankruptcy Judge.
The matter before the Court is an Application for Compensation and Reimbursement by Farm Credit Bank of Omaha [hereinafter FCBO] filed by Sioux Falls Attorney David L. Nadolski. FCBO, a secured and undersecured creditor in this Chapter 12 proceeding, made application for reimbursement of fees and expenses out of $19,000 paid to the Chapter 12 Trustee pursuant to a Compromise and Settlement Agreement involving Debtors’, net disposable income entered into between Debtors, FCBO, and the Chapter 12 Trustee.
FCBO believes its post-confirmation activities…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Khalil and Shahin Chinichian, Debtors. Khalil and Shahin Chinichian v. Attilio CampolongoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States Trustee v. Farm Credit Bank of Omaha (In Re Peterson)District Court, D. South Dakota · 1993
- In Re CorblyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1992
- In Re SchachterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999