Legal Opinion

United States Trustee v. Farm Credit Bank of Omaha (In Re Peterson)

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided February 8, 1993No. Civ. 92-4168PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN B. JONES, Chief Judge.

Introduction

The United States Trustee appeals the bankruptcy court’s Memorandum Decision of October 2, 1992, 145 B.R. 631. The United States Trustee contends that there is no authority in the Bankruptcy Code to support the bankruptcy court’s award of compensation for services rendered, and reimbursement for expenses incurred, by an attorney for a creditor in a Chapter 12 case. The Court agrees and for the following reasons reverses the judgment of the bankruptcy court.

Jurisdiction

This Court takes jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re BlountUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2002
  2. Matter of ZeddaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994
  3. In Re HackneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 2006
  4. In Re LagasseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1998
  5. In Re SchachterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API