Legal Opinion

U-Drive-Em Corporation v. Wiseman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 26, 1934No. 4-3638PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This is a suit brought by the U-Drive-Em Corporation et al., against Earl ft. Wiseman, as Commissioner of Eevenues, alleging the invalidity of § 31 of act No. 11, approved February 12, 1934.

A rather lengthy complaint was filed in which the plaintiffs alleged that various' taxes and licenses have grown heavier and heavier' and greater and greater until the passage of act No. 11, including the said § 31, which has imposed a burden upon the plaintiffs, and which, added to the other burdens already carried by taxicab operators, means that they cannot exist or continue to do business; that § 31…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. Magnano Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Veazie Bank v. FennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. BrodieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Wright v. HirschSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  5. Fort Smith v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Streight v. RaglandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Dicks v. NaffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Potts v. McCastlainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  4. Helena v. RusswurmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API