Legal Opinion

Sennott v. Seeber

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appellant’s principal point is that these are relatively minor injuries and do not warrant any such amount as the jury awarded.

The plaintiff already had some arthritis before the accident and two years ago had also been hospitalized for diabetes. Appellant first contends that it is the plaintiffs burden to segregate that portion of the hospital bill which is a result of the accident from that which might be attributed to other causes and make the same separation respecting loss of wages. We are not concerned with the hospital bill. Mrs. Sennotf s husband sued for that and collected. That case…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bethke v. DuweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Savino Dagnello v. Long Island Rail Road CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  2. Kink v. CombsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Theama v. City of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Ballard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Jones v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API