People v. Kozden
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AULT, J.
Acting in propria persona, defendant Tom Kozden filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s memorandum decision which required him to pay the County of San Diego a part of the cost of his court-appointed attorney under Penal Code section 987.8. The decision is signed by the judge and filed in the action; its final paragraph is couched in terms of an order. We treat the appeal as being from the appealable judgment which was entered later. (Rules 1, 2 and 31, Cal. Rules of Court; Martino v. Concord Community Hosp. Dist., 233 Cal.App.2d 51, 55-56 [43 Cal.Rptr. 255]; see gen. 6…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Prager v. IsrealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Martino v. Concord Community Hospital DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Thomas v. DriscollCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. PachecoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Estate of LockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. NilsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.