Legal Opinion

Hicklin v. LaDuca

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2000No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motions for a directed verdict at the close of proof on the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiff’s treating orthopedist testified that plaintiff did not sustain the injuries set forth in plaintiffs initial bill of particulars, and that the injury specified in plaintiffs supplemental bill of particulars was not caused by the accident. Plaintiffs case thus was based entirely on plaintiffs…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Mohamed v. DhanasarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Lichtman-Williams v. DesmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Wider v. Family Gard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Latiuk v. ConaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hicklin v. LaDucaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API