Legal Opinion

Latiuk v. Cona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s proof on the ground that plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Plaintiff’s treating psychiatrist testified to the objective medical findings of another physician, but he did not testify that those findings were related to the motor vehicle accident approximately two years before those findings were made (see, Lichtman-Williams v Desmond, 202 AD2d 646, lv dismissed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scheer v. KoubekNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Lichtman-Williams v. DesmondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Wider v. Family Gard, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Crandall v. SledziewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Eldred v. StoddardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hicklin v. LaDucaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API