Legal Opinion

Kelman v. Kelman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 23, 2004No. AC 24822PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The defendant, David A. Kelman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dissolving his marriage to the plaintiff, Charlotte L. Kelman. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly relied on the parties’ gross incomes rather than on their net incomes in fashioning its financial orders and (2) exceeded its authority pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-56c in fashioning its educational support orders. We disagree with the defendant’s first claim and agree with his second claim.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tele Tech of Connecticut Corp. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Morris v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Ludgin v. McGowanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Greco v. GrecoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Szynkowicz v. SzynkowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Kelman v. KelmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Maturo v. MaturoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. Procaccini v. ProcacciniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API