Legal Opinion

Zent v. State

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error : Court of Appeals for Knox county.

1Opinion of the Court

Shields, J.; Powell, J., concurring; Voorhees, J., not sitting.

At the February, 1914, term of the court of common pleas of Knox county, Ohio, the grand jury of said county returned an indictment against the plaintiff in error charging that “one Frank Zent, on or about the 5 th day of December, 1913, at the county of Knox, being then and there a male person of eighteen years and upwards, did then and there unlawfully and knowingly carnally know and abuse one M. S., with her consent, she, the said M. S., then and there being a female person under the age of sixteen years, to-wit, of the age of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. RatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. State v. NewtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. People v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Zachary v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Walden v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API