Legal Opinion

Mortgage Bond Co. of New York v. Carter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 16, 1935No. 6 Div. 611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

The bill is filed for rescission of a contract of purchase of a designated dwelling for fraudulent representations as to its condition, a cancellation of the notes and mortgage given to secure the remainder of the purchase money, and for an accounting, and recovery of the sum paid. Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. Spencer, 208 Ala. 663, 95 So. 1.

The attack upon the sufficiency of the bill is here rested upon the theory that it discloses upon ■ its face complainant too long delayed a rescission of the purchase after discovery of the fraud and a waiver on her part of the right to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. DeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. J. A. Fay & Egan Co. v. Independent Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Bullard Shoals Mining Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Day v. BroylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Stanard Tilton Milling Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  3. Shepherd v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API