Legal Opinion

Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Majure

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1936No. 32214Published

1Opinion

On a former day of this term of court, we considered and decided the above case on the record sent up from the court below, and held that the Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Company was not liable for the injury complained of, but that G.E. Hart, the other defendant and appellant on the record, was liable, and that the appeal bond given was liable for the judgment rendered, together with the ordinary consequences of costs of the appeal and damages. 167 So. 637. After the decision mentioned was announced, but before the judgment was entered on the minutes of the court, the attorneys representing…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. National Box Co. v. BradleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Schneider v. BerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Brown v. SuttonMississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. MajureMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hirsch Bros. & Co. v. R. E. Kennington Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API