Legal Opinion

Fowler v. Hyland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Manistee. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This suit originated in justice’s court. The' plaintiff declared orally on the following contract:

“Manistee, June 1st, 1880.

In consideration of the sum of one dollar, to me in hand paid, I hereby agree to permit S. W. Fowler and his tenants to pass over the usual road or place for hauling, over my premises, to get to and from his two houses, next north of the river, on Maple street.

Jos. Hyland,

her

Pleasant X Hyland.

mark.

Witness: E. G-. Embler.”

The breach alleged was “ that the said defendants have closed up said road and refused to permit and have not permitted said plaintiff or his tenants to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mee v. BenedictMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Loranger v. DavidsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Anderson Carriage Co. v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Everhard v. Dodge Bros.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Domestic Finance Co. v. PurserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API