Legal Opinion

Sampson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1992No. Nos. 05-92-01455 to 05-92-01457PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENOCH, Chief Justice.

The Court has before it motions to substitute Ross Teter as attorney of record on appeal. Because the requested substitutions require resolution of factual issues, we will order the trial court to conduct a hearing and to make written findings and recommendations.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The record before us indicates that appointed trial counsel Mike Morrow represented appellant, Osborn Sampson, through entry of the judgments. Sampson filed a pro se notice of appeal. Subsequently, Tet-er filed form documents titled, “Defendant’s Notice of Appeal, Proof of Indigency…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ex Parte AxelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Buntion v. HarmonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Reyes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  2. Hercules v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  3. Hogan, Lonnie Wayne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  4. Racheal Meachell Mathews v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  5. Racheal Meachell Mathews v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API