Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Candy Products Co.
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided May 11, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
These are motions to vacate notices for examination before trial of an officer of the defendant company. The motions are made on several grounds, but I shall consider only the ground worthy of attention on this motion, the others being in my opinion not well taken.
The notice is made returnable before a justice of the Supreme Court at the county courthouse in the borough of Manhattan, and this is assigned as one of the grounds for vacating such notice. The notice is given under the provisions of section 288 of the Civil Practice Act (as amd. by Laws of 1920, chap. 926), which apply *456to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Levine v. MoskowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Graziano v. Eagle Pencil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Crowe v. Marsh Garage Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1922
- Cohen v. MannNew York Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Howell v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. JonesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994