Legal Opinion

Levine v. Moskowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAvoy, J.:

The ruling now under review raises the question: May a party upon whose attorney a notice to appear for examination before trial is served, have inflicted upon him the penalty of striking out his pleading in the event that he fails to attend pursuant to a notice? As this penalty has inherently the same nature as that of a punishment for contempt through disobedience of an order or subpoena, the same considerations must govern its use.

No copy of a notice to attend the examination was served upon the defendant. No subpoena or order of the court requiring his appearance was served…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Tebo v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Levine v. BornsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. McCollum v. Birmingham Post Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Peters v. BerkeleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. Graziano v. Eagle Pencil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  5. Goldberg v. Candy Products Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API