Ludington v. Ford
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal in Chancery from Mason Circuit.
1Opinion of the Court
Marston, J:
The bill in this case was filed to correct a mistake. It is *124claimed, that at tlie time of the agreement of April 5, 1859, referred to in the case of Ford v. Loomis, supra p. 121, a certain description of land which was not embraced in the tax deeds to Durand, but which was embraced in the deeds from Ford to Durand of November 16, 1858, was by mistake omitted from the deed made by Durand to complainants.
In order for the complainants to obtain the relief sought, it must appear not only that there was an error on both sides, but the mistake must be admitted or distinctly proved.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tripp v. HasceigMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Case v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by11 opinions
- Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Miles v. ShreveMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Forester v. AukenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- Moffett, Hodgkins & Clarke Co. v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Holda v. GlickMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.