Legal Opinion

Miles v. Shreve

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1914No. Docket No. 169PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Bill by Mary Miles against Charles F. Shreve for reformation of a lease. From a decree for defendant, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

In this suit complainant sought a decree compelling rescission and cancellation or reformation of a certain “contract or lease” between herself and defendant on the following grounds, as stated in her counsel’s brief:

*673“First, the scrivener and parties hereto, one or all, having made a mistake; and, second, that, after the mistake was discovered, the defendant agreed with complainant to rectify the mistake, and agreed to the drawing of a new lease, with a different rental than that contained in the original paper in suit, which, I submit, it is manifest was drawn as the contract for a lease,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Vary v. SheaMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Case v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Ludington v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Young v. McGownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Retan v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Emery v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ross v. DammMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Holda v. GlickMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Stolte v. Krentel.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API