Legal Opinion
11 Duke Street, Ltd. v. Ryman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 27, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered March 30, 2000, which denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and granted defendant Ryman’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint only to the extent of dismissing plaintiffs third cause of action for conversion, unanimously modified, on the law, defendant’s cross motion granted to the additional extent of dismissing the second cause of action seeking specific performance, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Specific performance is unavailable where there is an adequate remedy at law (see, Demilo…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Wagner Advertising Corp. v. S & M EnterprisesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Maurillo v. Park Slope U-HaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Arol Development Corp. v. Whitman & RansomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Edwards v. North American Van LinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Health-Loom Corp. v. Soho Plaza Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Time Warner City Cable v. Adelphi UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Alpha Auto Brokers, Ltd. v. Continental InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- First National of North America, LC v. Nations Credit Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Gonzalez v. Beacon Terminal Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Quantum Corporate Funding, Ltd. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone, LPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007