Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of A. M. Townson & Co., Bankrupt

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 5, 1960No. 12997_1Published

1DissentKalodner, Circuit Judge

I would reverse the Order of the District Court.

I would do so for these reasons:

First, the deposit “set-off doctrine” is not applicable to bank accounts of receivers in bankruptcy since they are in custodia legis.

Second, assuming arguendo, that the doctrine is applicable to bankruptcy receivers’ accounts, there was error in its application in the instant case for these reasons:(a) The designation “Special Machinery Account” was sufficient to put the bank on inquiry that the funds in it were at the minimum the subject of a claim of ownership by someone other than the bankruptcy receiver since…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pepper v. LittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Co. v. De Witt & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Prudence Realization Corp. v. GeistSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. The Inter-State National Bank of Kansas City v. Frank Luther, Trustee, Matter of Garden Grain & Seed Company, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  5. In Re Columbia Ribbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API