Legal Opinion

Coney v. Cox

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1932No. 13348PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

These cases were heard together on circuit, and by consent of counsel are heard together here.

They sound in tort and grow out of the same occurrence, viz., a collision between the Ford roadster, driven by George R. Coney, Jr., and which was the property of his wife, Clara A. Coney, and a Ford truck, the property of G. Wayne Cox, and driven by his agent and employee, R. M. Rushing.

The allegations of the complaint, summarized, are that plaintiff was driving along Carolina Street in the City of Charleston, traveling from east to west;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cirsosky v. SmathersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  2. Townsend v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Thomas v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Mullis v. Pinnacle Flour & Feed Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. Southern Railway, Carolina Div.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  2. Wynn v. ROODSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  3. Howle v. WoodsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Hopkins v. HensonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Hiott v. BishopSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API