Legal Opinion
United States v. Christie
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 13, 2008No. Criminal 07-332 (HAA)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON PRETRIAL MOTIONS
ACKERMAN, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the pretrial motions (Doc. Nos. 39 and 47) filed by Defendant Russell Christie, praying for various forms of relief. In the first motion (Doc. No. 39), filed by his counsel on his behalf, he makes four primary arguments. First, Christie seeks to dismiss several Counts of the Superseding Indictment. Second, Christie seeks to suppress both evidence seized during a search of his home, and statements allegedly made by him prior to his arrest. Third, Christie requests a hearing to determine…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mills v. City of HarrisburgDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- United States v. C.R.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- United States v. Matthew Bryan CaniffCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Cucuta v. New York CityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Seifert v. RiveraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.