Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Grolman

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided May 30, 2012No. SUCV201103824APublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Fabricant, Judith, J.

INTRODUCTION

This action presents a claim of legal malpractice. Before the Court is the defendant’s motion to dismiss, on the grounds that the claims are the subject of a prior pending action and are barred by the applicable statutes of limitations. For the reasons that will be explained, the motion will be allowed, and the action will be ordered dismissed.

BACKGROUND

For purposes of the present motion, the Court accepts as true all well-pleaded factual allegations of the complaint, but disregards conclusions and characterizations asserted therein. See Sisson v. Lhowe, 460…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Iannacchino v. Ford Motor Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Eyal v. Helen Broadcasting Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. TLT Construction Corp. v. A. Anthony Tappe & Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. Mongeau v. BoutelleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baker v. Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr, LLPMassachusetts Superior Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API