Patterson v. Munyan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged trespass upon the land claimed by the plaintiff to he owned by him and in his possession. • The plaintiff obtained judgment for one dollar and costs,, from which, and an order refusing a new trial, defendant has appealed.
The first contention urged by appellant for the reversal of the judgment and order is: That the burden of proof showing the location of the northwesterly line of a certain highway (No. 520), which was the boundary between the plaintiff’s land and the highway, was thrown upon the plaintiff, and that he failed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hayward v. ManzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Watkins v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Babcock v. WelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shanline v. WiltsieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Public Utilities Commission v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1963