Legal Opinion

Lederer v. Goldston

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1909PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of New York.

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order entered upon motion of the plaintiff, substituting Gustav E. Hamburger, Esq., in the place and stead of Messrs. Gluck, Alden & Grey, attorneys of record for the plaintiff. This motion was granted upon condition that this plaintiff “ give a good and sufficient undertaking in the sum of $250 as security for any claims his attorneys of record herein may have against him.”

A client has the right to change his attorney at any time, with or without cause; but this right can only be exercised upon payment to the attorney of the amount due him. The lien of an attorney…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon, Huffaker & Garnett v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Seleznow v. ShubCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API