Legal Opinion

Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Nationsbank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1997No. 95-0515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GONZALEZ, Justice, joined by CORNYN, SPECTOR, and ABBOTT, Justices,

dissenting on motion for rehearing.

The contract at issue clearly denotes the parties’ intent that “there shall be no deductions from the value of Lessor’s royalty by reason of any ... cost of ... transportation.” The Court’s unprecedented refusal to enforce the contract as written has generated quite a controversy. Since our original opinions issued on April 25, 1996, the following educational institutions, charitable organizations, independent mineral and royalty owners, and oil and gas practitioners have filed amicus curiae…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. NationsBankTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. University of Texas Medical Branch v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State Farm Life Insurance Co v. BeastonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. v. HyderTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Gordon Potts v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.LCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. Jason D. Ray v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2019
  4. Bluestone Natural Resources II, Llc v. Walker Murray RandleTexas Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API