Legal Opinion
United States v. Kocmond
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 9, 1953No. 10644_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
On July 2, 1951, the United States Attorney filed a criminal information charging the defendants Charles C. Kocmond, Matt Klarsch and Robert Klotz, doing business as partners under the trade-names “K & S Dog Food” and “Metropolitan Distributing Company,” with violation of 21 U.S. C.A. § 331 (k), 343(a), (e) (1), (i) (1), in that they had sold and delivered horse meat without complying with the labeling requirements of the respective sections of the statute mentioned. A jury trial resulted in a verdict of guilty and judgment imposing a fine upon defendants and committing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- White v. Winchester Country ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Wiesenfeld Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. AmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Midwest Game Company v. MFA Milling CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- United States v. H. B. Gregory Co. A Corporation, and James H. Gregory, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. 10 Cartons, More or Less, Each Containing 26,332 Black Tablets of an Article of Drug Labeled in Part "Hoxsey"District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.