Legal Opinion
Continental Casualty Co. v. Lolley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 1, 1943No. 29779PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
On May 7, 1935, A. A. Kaplan, a resident of Dallas, Tex., procured an automobile liability insurance policy from the Continental Casualty Company through its agency in said city. This policy was written to protect the named assured, and such additional assureds as came within the provisions of an omnibus clause contained in said policy, against liability arising out of accident in the operation of a certain Chevrolet automobile., The policy contained the following provision:
“This policy does not cover any automobile . . . (d) while driven by or in charge of any person under the age limit…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GuentherSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Utilities Ins. Co. v. MontgomeryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1940
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- McDanels v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Daniel v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Home Fire Assur. Co. of New York v. Mid-West Enterprise Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
- Subscribers at Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. SimsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- GENERAL ACC. FIRE & LIFE ASSUR. CORP. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.