Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Dohmann

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1969No. Civ. 25456Published

1Opinion of the CourtElkington, J.

Plaintiff, Needa Stanton, appeals from a judgment entered upon a defense verdict in a personal injury action involving a rear end collision.

We meet at the outset her contention that evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to justify the court’s giving of an instruction on contributory negligence. Here, as in Rodri quez v. Lompoc Truck Co., 227 Cal.App.2d 769, 775 [39 Cal. Rptr. 117], inquiry is limited to whether “the record shows (slight or, at least, some evidence upon the issue.’ [Citation.] '[I]n order to find that the giving of any certain instruction was not warranted by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green Trees Enterprises, Inc. v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Johnson v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Rodriquez v. Lompoc Truck Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API