Legal Opinion

Freyhan v. Wertheimer

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1907Published

Motion to compel defendants to accept service of a second amended complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.

After service of the complaint by mail the defendants obtained and served an order to show cause returnable on December 24, 1906, to compel the plaintiff to amend his complaint by separately stating and numbering his causes of action. After some communications had parsed between the attorneys for the respective parties they agreed, by stipulation, dated December thirty-first, that such motion might be withdrawn. The copy stipula*637tion attached to the moving papers recites thai “ the above named plaintiff having served an amended complaint as of course, with the causes of action stated, it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frank v. BushNew York City Court · 1882
  2. White v. Mayor of New YorkThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
  3. Mussinan v. HattonThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1894
  4. Lintzenich v. StevensNew York Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API