Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Sheriff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1977No. 10139PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

After being ordered to stand trial for the possession of a controlled substance (marijuana), in violation of NRS 453.336 and NRS 453.161, Daniel Lee Rhodes petitioned for habeas corpus. His petition was denied and this appeal has been perfected.

The contraband which appellant is accused of “constructively” possessing was found in a suitcase which police officers, without a warrant, had removed from a closet of a residence appellant was visiting.

In a recent case, involving similar facts, where the officer had a warrant, we wrote that to support a charge of possession that it was…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maskaly v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Woerner v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Oxborrow v. Sheriff, Nye CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1977

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sheriff, Clark County v. FernandezNevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API