State v. Addcock
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from. Stoddard Circuit Court.•—Hon. R. P. Owen, Judge. The indictment follows the language of the statute, and is therefore sufficient. State v. Stubblefield, 32 Mo. 563; State v. Fulton, 19 Mo. 680; State v. Hereford, 13 Mo.. 3 ; Commonwealth v. Welsh, 7 Gray 324; State v. Marshall, 47 Mo. 378.
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
Defendant was indicted at tlie June term, 1874, of tlie Stoddard county circuit court, for aiding prisoners to escape from the jail of said county. lie was tried and convicted at the December term, 1874, of said court, and his punishment assessed to two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. Unsuccessful motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment having been made in due time, he brings the cause here by appeal. Neither the evidence nor the instructions are preserved in the bill of exceptions, and the only question presented for our determination is the sufficiency of the indictment. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- State v. PresburySupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. WestSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- People v. PierroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.