Legal Opinion
United States v. James Pinkerman, United States of America v. Frank Martin
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 7, 1967No. 10890_1PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. SPENCER BELL, Circuit Judge:
Defendants Pinkerman and Martin were convicted of violations of the Internal Revenue laws of the United States in a jury trial. Pinkerman was charged in a three-count indictment with unlawful possession, custody and control of an unregistered still in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5179(a) and 5601(a) (1) (1964), carrying on the business of a distiller without posting bond in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5601(a) (4) and 5173(a) (1964), and conspiracy to violate the Internal Revenue laws pertaining to distilled spirits in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1964). He was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Grover Lee Mullin and Stephen Parker PerryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- William Spinelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Richard NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- United States v. Joseph Jesse EspinozaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Thomas Anderson (Aka Workman), United States of America v. Samuel LovingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.