Legal Opinion
Shultz v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 23, 1986No. 84CA0417, 84CA0702PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN CISE, Judge.
In this product liability and negligence case, plaintiffs, Robert and Kathy Shultz, appeal from the trial court’s entry of directed verdicts and judgments thereon in favor of defendants, Linden-Alimak, Inc., and Linden-Alimak, A.B. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
In December 1978, Robert Shultz (plaintiff) was employed by Hensel Phelps Construction Company (employer) as an iron worker during the construction of a building in Denver. The equipment that is the subject of this litigation was a personnel hoist operated as an elevator outside the building and held in place by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hiigel v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Leake v. CainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Kysor Industrial Corp. v. FrazierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Morris v. RedakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Great Western Sugar Co. v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- American Water Development, Inc. v. City of AlamosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Cherry Creek School District 5 v. Voelker Ex Rel. VoelkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- States v. RD Werner Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- Frontier Exploration, Inc. v. American National Fire Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gutierrez v. BusseyColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.