Legal Opinion

BANCHIERE v. SAUL

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 2022No. 2:20-cv-01512Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW GREGORY BANCHIERE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil No. 20-1512 ) ANDREW SAUL, ) ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of January 2022, the Court having considered the parties’ cross-motions seeking summary judgment will grant Defendant’s motion except as to costs.1 The agency’s final decision denying Plaintiff’s application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act (“Act”),

42 U.S.C. § 401

et seq., is supported by substantial evidence,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  4. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
  5. Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API