Legal Opinion

Josselson v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 24, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pike Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, C ommissioner

Reversing.

Appellant, Frank Josselson, was indicted for the offense of selling, loaning, procuring for and furnishing intoxicating liquors to another in Pike County, Kentucky, where the local option law was in force. He was tried and convicted, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $60. From the judgment of conviction he prosecutes this appeal.

The evidence heard on the trial is, in substance, as follows;

H. M. Hoskins, the purchaser of the liquor, states that while in a pool room in Pikeville, appellant inquired of him if he “wanted…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Gast, Crofts & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Parker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Calhoun v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Josselson Bros. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Josselson Bros. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Frogg v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Rist v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Rist v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API