Legal Opinion
Hobbs v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided June 23, 1961No. Civ. 1112, 1125PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, District Judge.
This matter is presently before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The grounds alleged in support of the Motion for Summary Judgment are that the above-entitled actions were “not commenced within the time required by law, and (are) barred' by the statute of limitations, there being no genuine issue as to any material fact on the issue of the statute of limitations.”
Before embarking upon a discussion and disposition of this Motion, a brief statement of the salient facts would be in order here:
The Complaint in Civil No. 1112 (Ada Hobbs) was filed on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Roe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Buckeye v. BuckeyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Gray v. GraySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Mason v. RoseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Maroon v. State, Department of Mental HealthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Thomas D. George, John C. Winthrop, and Charles F. Fink v. Douglas Aircraft Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Horvath v. DavidsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
- In Re DamatoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Jenkins v. HaymoreColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.