Legal Opinion
Naquin v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 2014No. 2013 CA 1638PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrain, J.
|Jn this suit seeking to cancel a lease of immovable property, the lessee filed a re-conventional demand asserting that the plaintiffs’ suit was a disturbance of the lessee’s peaceful possession of the property. The trial court sustained an exception of no cause of action and dismissed the reconventional demand. We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The plaintiffs, Lorise M. Naquin, Lucy Nguyen Naquin, and Grantly, LLC (collectively referred to hereinafter as “the Na-quins”), filed this proceeding seeking to cancel several leases of immovable property granted to Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Royal Ins. v. Romain Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Scheffler v. Adams and Reese, LLPSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Pearl River Basin Land & Development Co. v. State Ex Rel. Governor's Office of Homeland Security & Emergency PreparednessLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Pierrotti v. JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carr v. Sanderson Farm, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Causey v. Winn-Dixie Logistics, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Tracer Sec. Servs., Inc. v. LedetLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Carr v. Sanderson Farms, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Constantin Land Trust v. Pitre Industries, L.L.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.