Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Ramadoss v. Caremark Inc.

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided August 27, 2008No. 5:99-cv-00914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CARE-MARK’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING THE GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROYAL FURGESON, District Judge.

I. Introduction . .672

III. Background.673

A. Medicaid.673

B. Third Party Liability.675

C. The Role of Caremark.676

D. Caremark v. Goetz.678

E. Restrictions and Assignment.681

F. Brief Procedural History.682

IV. Standard of Review.683

V.Applicability of False Claims Act. 684

A. Presentment.684

B. The False Claims Act. lO CO 0

1) Falsity. 685

i. A True Statement is not False under the False Claims Act. 687

ii. A Claim Cannot…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Department of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. United States v. Caremark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  4. United States ex rel. Branch Consultants, L.L.C. v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009
  5. Erickson v. Penn National Gaming, IncDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API