Legal Opinion

M. S. v. K. T.

New York City Family Court

Decided July 23, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William P. Warren, J.

The court has before it an application brought on by notice of motion in which the respondent, the Catholic Home Bureau, is seeking to have this court dismiss the proceeding on the ground of equitable estoppel and, alternatively, awarding respondent summary judgment dismissing the proceeding. The application is supported by an affirmation subscribed to by Frederick J. Magovem, Esq., on June 26, 1998, who is counsel for the Catholic Home Bureau. Counsel for the petitioner, M. S., has submitted an affirmation in opposition to the respondent’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Sharon GG. v. Duane HH.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. David L. v. Cindy Pearl L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Bergner v. KickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Sandra S. v. Larry W.New York City Family Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Bidermann Industries U.S.A., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  2. Commissioner of Social Services v. W.L.New York City Family Court · 2005
  3. C.M. v. S.H.New York City Family Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API