Legal Opinion

C.M. v. S.H.

New York City Family Court

Decided April 23, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court

*218OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard S. Lawrence, J.

This matter was referred to this court by the Support Magistrate for determination as to whether the petitioner may invoke the doctrine of equitable estoppel to deny respondent’s request for genetic testing in this paternity proceeding.

Upon the initial appearance of the parties, this court assigned the Nassau County Legal Aid Society to represent the respondent and County Law article 18-b counsel to represent the petitioner. The Support Magistrate assigned a Law Guardian prior to the referral to this court. This court then established a schedule for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. MTR. OF SHONDEL J. v. Mark D.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Maby H. v. Joseph H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Lorie F. v. Raymond F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API