Legal Opinion

Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. v. McDonald'S Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1977No. Nos. 75-1203 and 75-1202PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge:

This is a copyright infringement action. Plaintiffs Sid and Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc., and Sid and Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. were awarded $50,000.00 in their action against defendants McDonald’s Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc. Defendants were found to have infringed plaintiffs’ “H. R. Pufnstuf” children’s television show by the production of their “McDonaldland” television commercials.

*1161Plaintiffs argue on appeal that the district court erred in awarding damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 101(b). They contend that the court should…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Dairy Queen, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brooktree Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. Lafferty, Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. LaffertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  3. Silverman v. CBS INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Whelan Associates, Inc. v. Jaslow Dental Laboratory, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API