Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 14, 1989No. 2 CA-SA 89-0126PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROLL, Presiding Judge.

The state files this petition for special action in connection with the trial court’s granting of defendant Salvador Garcia Prado’s motion for new trial based upon juror misconduct. Because the impeachment of the jury’s verdict resulted from impermissible intrusion into the jury’s mental processes, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.

FACTS

In June 1989, defendant Salvador Garcia Prado stood trial on four counts of unlawful sale of a narcotic drug. The jury returned verdicts finding Prado guilty on all four counts. When the jury was polled, unanimity was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Amos v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  3. State v. MelcherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  4. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. State v. HuttonArizona Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dusold v. Porta-John Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Neely v. RodriguezArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. RaschCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API