Legal Opinion
Oregonians for Floodplain Protection v. U.S. Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2018No. Civil Action No. 2017-1179Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D OREGONIANS FOR FLOODPLAIN ) SEP 2 1 2018 PRoTECTIoN, er al., Clerk, U.S. Dlstrict & Bankruptcy ' ' f rthe DistrictofCo|umbia Plalntlffs, Courts o v. Civil Action No. 17-cv-1179 (RJL) THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, et al., Defendant. : MEM()R NDUM OPINION (seprember Ll 2018) [Dkts ## 18, 27] \./\/\/\_/VVV\/\/ Before the Court is a motion to dismiss by defendants for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. lZ(b)(l), and plaintiffs’ motion to strike defendants’ notice of supplemental facts. Defs.’ Mot. to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.