Legal Opinion

Brukhman v. Giuliani

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 2000PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Bellacosa, J.

This case presents the question whether the prevailing wage provision of the New York State Constitution (art I, § 17) applies to public assistance beneficiaries who are statutorily required to participate in a Work Experience Program (Program) as a condition of continued receipt of monetary grants.

The Social Services Law in effect at the commencement of this suit (§ 336-c) directed the computation of Program participation hours for the various work assignments and experiences, based on the greater of the Federal minimum wage or the typically higher prevailing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Social Investigator Eligibles Ass'n v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Corrigan v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Twin State CCS Corp. v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Varsity Transit Inc. v. SaporitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Pinkwater v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. De La Cruz v. Caddell Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Carver v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. The Matter of Walter E. Carver v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Stone v. McGowanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API