Legal Opinion
Twin State CCS Corp. v. Roberts
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 12, 1988PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to the Appellate Division, Third Department, for determination of issues not passed upon by that court.
Petitioner, who installed a telecommunications system in the Clinton County Government Center, seeks review of a determination that it failed to pay prevailing wages to nine of its telephone installers pursuant to Labor Law § 220 (3). The determination was made after a compliance hearing required by Labor Law § 220 (8).
The Appellate Division concluded that the failure to annex *899the "prevailing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Erie County Industrial Development Agency v. RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- O'Neill v. SchechterNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Schultz Construction, Inc. v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Schultz Construction, Inc. v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- De La Cruz v. Caddell Dry Dock & Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Achen-Gardner, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- Brukhman v. GiulianiNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Naftilos Painting & Sandblasting, Inc. v. HartnettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.