Danforth v. Freeman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Assumpsit. The facts which were found by a referee appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Parsons, «T.
This is ah action to recover the balance due upon the contract price for building a house, with sundry claims for extra work. The case has been heard by a referee, who states the account between the parties, in which he allows the plaintiffs the contract price and sundry items of extra labor and material, in all $3,234.58, and allows the defendant sundry cash payments and items for failure to comply with the terms of the contract, amounting to $2,923.35, and finds due the plaintiffs $311.23. The questions reserved upon the referee’s report are as to the meaning of the clause in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Pinches v. Swedish Evangelical Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
- Moulton v. McOwenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Cullen v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- White v. McLarenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- R. J. Berke & Co. v. J. P. Griffin, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Emery v. Caledonia Sand and Gravel Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Heitz v. SayersSuperior Court of Delaware · 1923
- M. W. Goodell Construction Co. v. Monadnock Skating Club, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.