Legal Opinion
Smith v. Floyd County Board of Education
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided November 22, 2005No. CIV.A. 03-304PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CALDWELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment (Rec. No. 22) of' the Defendants, Floyd County Board of Education (the “Board”) and its Superintendent, Paul W. Fanning (“Superintendent Fanning”), in both his individual and official capacities. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part.
I. FACTS.
A. Smith’s Employment.
Plaintiff Dani Smith (“Smith”) asserts that she began employment for the Board in March 2001 as a math teacher at Betsy Layne High School. (Rec. No. 1, Complaint ¶ 5). She states…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- C.K. ex rel. A.K. v. Bell County Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012
- Williams v. CITY OF FRANKLIN, TENN.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Gilbert v. Frankfort Independent School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024